Proposal: Allow Views to subscribe to server resource updates via resources/subscribe

[quotentiroler]

Proposal: Allow Views to subscribe to server resource updates via resources/subscribe

Summary

Add resources/subscribe and resources/unsubscribe to the set of standard MCP messages that Views (UI iframes) can send through the host, and define notifications/resources/updated forwarding from host to View. This enables real-time, server-pushed data updates for interactive UIs without polling via repeated resources/read.

Motivation

The current MCP Apps spec (2026-01-26) allows Views to read server resources via resources/read but not subscribe to changes. For UIs that display live data — dashboards, monitors, collaborative editors, multiplayer games, streaming feeds — the only option today is polling via resources/read on a timer. This is:

1. Wasteful — generates unnecessary server load and API traffic when nothing has changed
2. Laggy — minimum latency is bounded by poll interval, not by actual data availability
3. Inconsistent — the core MCP spec already supports resources/subscribe + notifications/resources/updated between client and server, but the MCP Apps extension blocks Views from using it

The gap is already visible in the ecosystem. UI libraries building on MCP Apps have independently implemented subscription mechanisms with automatic polling fallbacks for hosts that don't support subscriptions. The native subscription path cannot be exercised because no host currently advertises subscription support — only the polling fallback runs in practice.

Proposed Changes

1. Add to Standard MCP Messages (View → Host)

Add to the allowed message list in "Standard MCP Messages":

• resources/subscribe — Subscribe to updates for a resource URI
• resources/unsubscribe — Unsubscribe from a previously subscribed resource URI

2. Add to Notifications (Host → View)

• notifications/resources/updated — Host forwards this notification to the View when the server signals a subscribed resource has changed

// Host → View notification
{
  jsonrpc: "2.0",
  method: "notifications/resources/updated",
  params: {
    uri: string  // URI of the updated resource
  }
}

The View would then typically call resources/read to fetch the updated content — same pattern as the core MCP spec.

3. Host Capabilities

Add subscribe?: boolean to HostCapabilities.serverResources:

interface HostCapabilities {
  // ...existing fields...
  serverResources?: {
    listChanged?: boolean;
    subscribe?: boolean;  // NEW: host supports proxying resource subscriptions
  };
}

Views MUST check hostCapabilities.serverResources.subscribe before sending resources/subscribe. If absent or false, Views SHOULD fall back to polling via resources/read.

4. Subscription Limits

Add optional maxSubscriptions to host capabilities:

serverResources?: {
  listChanged?: boolean;
  subscribe?: boolean;
  maxSubscriptions?: number;  // Per-View subscription cap (e.g., 10)
};

Host MUST reject resources/subscribe with a JSON-RPC error when the limit is reached:

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 5,
  "error": {
    "code": -32001,
    "message": "Subscription limit reached",
    "data": {
      "uri": "data://metrics/live",
      "maxSubscriptions": 10
    }
  }
}

Note: -32002 is already used by the core MCP spec for "Resource not found." A new application-level error code should be defined for subscription limits. -32001 is used here as a placeholder — the final code should be coordinated with the core spec maintainers.

5. Lifecycle & Cleanup

Add to the existing Cleanup section:

When a View is torn down (via ui/resource-teardown or iframe removal), the Host MUST send resources/unsubscribe to the MCP server for every active subscription that was proxied on behalf of that View. The Host MUST track all subscriptions per View.

6. Security Requirements

Requirement	Details
Per-View subscription cap	Host MUST enforce maxSubscriptions (default: 10 if unspecified)
Scoping	Subscriptions MUST be scoped to the originating server connection. A View MUST NOT receive notifications from a different server's resources
Rate limiting	Host SHOULD rate-limit forwarded notifications/resources/updated to the View (e.g., max 10/sec per URI) to prevent amplification
Cleanup on teardown	Host MUST unsubscribe all on View teardown — no orphaned server-side state
URI validation	Host SHOULD validate that subscribed URIs match resources previously returned by resources/list or resources/read from the same server

Message Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant V as View (iframe)
    participant H as Host
    participant S as MCP Server

    V->>H: resources/subscribe { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    H->>S: resources/subscribe { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    S-->>H: subscription confirmed
    H-->>V: subscription confirmed

    Note over S: Data changes
    S--)H: notifications/resources/updated { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    H--)V: notifications/resources/updated { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    V->>H: resources/read { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    H->>S: resources/read { uri: "data://metrics/live" }
    S-->>H: updated contents
    H-->>V: updated contents

    Note over V: View teardown
    H->>S: resources/unsubscribe { uri: "data://metrics/live" }

Loading

Graceful Degradation

Views that want real-time updates SHOULD implement a dual-path pattern:

const hostCaps = await getHostCapabilities();

if (hostCaps.serverResources?.subscribe) {
  // Real-time path
  await client.request("resources/subscribe", { uri });
  client.onNotification("notifications/resources/updated", async ({ uri }) => {
    const data = await client.request("resources/read", { uri });
    updateUI(data);
  });
} else {
  // Polling fallback
  setInterval(async () => {
    const data = await client.request("resources/read", { uri });
    updateUI(data);
  }, 5000);
}

Why Not Just Poll?

	Polling (resources/read loop)	Subscription
Latency	Bounded by interval (seconds)	Near-instant
Server load	O(n) per interval regardless of changes	O(1) per actual change
Complexity for View developer	Timer management, dedup, cleanup	Subscribe once, handle events
Works today	Yes	Requires host support

Scope

This proposal does NOT introduce:

• New subscription semantics beyond what core MCP already defines
• View-to-View communication
• Cross-server subscriptions
• Any change to the server-side resources/subscribe spec

It only allows Views to access an existing core MCP capability through the host proxy, with appropriate security controls.

Prior Art

• Core MCP spec (2025-03-26 and 2025-11-25): resources/subscribe + notifications/resources/updated fully specified for client↔server
• HostCapabilities.serverResources.listChanged already exists in the MCP Apps spec — subscribe is the natural companion field
• @maxhealth.tech/prefab (Max-Health-Inc/prefab): Working reference implementation of this proposal's dual-path pattern. The bridge (src/renderer/bridge.ts) sends resources/subscribe via JSON-RPC when the host supports it, listens for both notifications/resources/updated and ui/notifications/resource-updated, and returns a cleanup function that sends resources/unsubscribe. Host capability is detected from hostCapabilities.resources.subscribe during the ui/initialize handshake. When no host advertises support, the Subscribe action falls back to SetInterval + CallTool polling automatically. The native subscription path exists and is fully wired but has never been exercised on a real host — only the polling fallback runs today.
• PrefectHQ/fastmcp (#3641): FastMCP doesn't yet support resources/subscribe / resources/unsubscribe (both listed as expected failures in the MCP conformance suite). A design proposal for per-server subscription tracking with deterministic cleanup is under review. Once shipped, servers will handle subscriptions — but Views still can't use them without this spec change. CC @jlowin @syhstanley
• PrefectHQ/prefab (repo): Prefect's own UI framework has no subscription support — it uses SetInterval + CallTool polling for live data, illustrating the gap even for the team building both the server framework and the UI framework.

[goodguy1963]

yes please