Skip to content

feat: export dictionary arrow device arrays#8251

Open
0ax1 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
ad/dictionary
Open

feat: export dictionary arrow device arrays#8251
0ax1 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
ad/dictionary

Conversation

@0ax1

@0ax1 0ax1 commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@0ax1 0ax1 force-pushed the ad/dictionary branch from ce68648 to c8021f1 Compare June 4, 2026 14:26
@0ax1 0ax1 added the changelog/feature A new feature label Jun 4, 2026
@0ax1 0ax1 force-pushed the ad/dictionary branch from c8021f1 to a77e8d3 Compare June 4, 2026 14:27
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 16.59%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1509 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation encode_varbin[(10000, 2)] 901.5 µs 1,059.2 µs -14.89%
Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 46.6 µs 31.7 µs +47.35%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 198.2 µs 162 µs +22.35%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] 213.7 µs 177.5 µs +20.41%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ad/dictionary (20592f5) with develop (5e3aedb)

Open in CodSpeed

@0ax1 0ax1 force-pushed the ad/dictionary branch 5 times, most recently from 9c7eee9 to 31bff95 Compare June 8, 2026 13:07
Signed-off-by: Alexander Droste <alexander.droste@protonmail.com>
@0ax1 0ax1 force-pushed the ad/dictionary branch from 31bff95 to 20592f5 Compare June 8, 2026 13:16
@0ax1 0ax1 requested review from onursatici and robert3005 June 8, 2026 13:17
@0ax1 0ax1 marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2026 13:17
@0ax1 0ax1 requested a review from a team June 8, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/feature A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant