GH-34785: [Doc][Parquet] Update doc for bloom filter support #48860
+3
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
7 tasks
pitrou
changed the title
pitrou
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2026
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting committer review
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 7820f67. There weren't enough matching historic benchmark results to make a call on whether there were regressions. The full Conbench report has more details. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Writing support for Parquet bloom filter has been added so the doc is out of date.
What changes are included in this PR?
Update the doc to reflect the status that bloom filter is fully supported but not integrated with data read api.
Are these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
No