GH-49521: [CI][Packaging] Try removing KEY that seems bad from downloaded KEYS file

[raulcd]

Rationale for this change

Some CI jobs fail validating a newly added GPG key.

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove this key from the processed ones on the packaging jobs as we do with others similar.

Are these changes tested?

Yes on CI

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

• GitHub Issue: [CI] Linux packaging jobs failing due to GPG check FAILED #49521

[github-actions]

⚠️ GitHub issue #49521 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

[raulcd]

@kou I am not sure why the newly added key from @jbonofre made the jobs fail. If we skip it (as we do with a couple others) the jobs are successful again

[raulcd]

Something about SHA1?

   Key imported successfully
  Importing GPG key 0xC8282E76:
   Userid     : "Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jbonofre@apache.org>"
   Fingerprint: 1AA8 CF92 D409 A733 93D0 B736 BFF2 EE42 C828 2E76
   From       : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Apache-Arrow
  warning: Signature not supported. Hash algorithm SHA1 not available.
  Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - aarch64 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00   

[kou]

+1

Yes. Newer distributions don't accept SHA1 for security.

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 9082b47.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.