-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 992
test(firestore): silence stack trace output from run_tests.ts
#9454
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
When using `run_tests.ts` (e.g., when running Firestore Lite tests), a noisy stack trace is output when tests fail. This is unecessarily noisy. This modifies the script to only output a stack trace for real crashes, not test failures.
|
Summary of ChangesHello @dlarocque, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the output behavior of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to improve the test running script by silencing stack traces for test failures, while still showing them for actual crashes. The approach of catching the promise rejection from spawn is correct. However, I've found a potential issue in how different error types are distinguished, which could lead to an unhandled exception in some crash scenarios. I've provided a suggestion to make the error handling more robust.
| if (error.code) { | ||
| process.exit(error.code); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // The error code will be undefined if it was a real crash (e.g., spawn failed to start), | ||
| // so print the entire stack trace for debugging. | ||
| console.error(error); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current check if (error.code) is not robust enough to distinguish between a test failure (which results in a numeric exit code) and a spawn failure. If spawn fails (e.g., because the command is not found), the error object will have a code property that is a string (e.g., 'ENOENT'). Calling process.exit() with a string argument will throw a TypeError, which would then be an unhandled exception inside the catch block, defeating the purpose of this error handling.
To make this more robust, you should check if error.code is a number. This will correctly differentiate between test failures and other crashes.
I've also updated the comments to be more accurate.
| if (error.code) { | |
| process.exit(error.code); | |
| } else { | |
| // The error code will be undefined if it was a real crash (e.g., spawn failed to start), | |
| // so print the entire stack trace for debugging. | |
| console.error(error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| if (typeof error.code === 'number') { | |
| process.exit(error.code); | |
| } else { | |
| // The error code will not be a number for a real crash (e.g., spawn | |
| // failed to start), so print the entire stack trace for debugging. | |
| console.error(error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } |
When using
run_tests.ts(e.g., when running Firestore Lite tests), a noisy stack trace is output when tests fail. A stack trace isn't necessary in this case.This modifies the script to only output a stack trace for real crashes, not test failures.
Before:
After: