Update developer-experience.md

[epanareda]

questions => answers

Description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why:

Issues fixed by this PR (if any):

PRs or commits this PR depends on (if any):

Presubmit checklist

• If you are unwilling, or unable, to sign the CLA, even for a tiny, one-word PR, please file an issue instead of a PR.
• If this PR is not meant to land until a future stable release, mark it as draft with an explanation.
• This PR follows the Google Developer Documentation Style Guidelines—for example, it doesn't use i.e. or e.g., and it avoids I and we (first-person pronouns).
• This PR uses semantic line breaks
  of 80 characters or fewer.

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @epanareda, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a minor but important grammatical correction within the developer-experience.md documentation. The change ensures that the text accurately conveys the intended meaning, thereby enhancing the overall readability and precision of the developer experience guidelines.

Highlights

• Documentation Correction: Corrected a grammatical error in the developer-experience.md file, changing "The questions to these questions" to "The answers to these questions" for improved clarity and accuracy.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes 'questions' to 'answers' in the developer experience documentation, which makes the sentence logically sound in its context. I've added one suggestion to further simplify the phrasing of the modified sentence to enhance readability, aligning with the Google Developer Documentation Style Guidelines mentioned in the PR.

[parlough]

Thanks for noticing and fixing this!

However, before we can properly review and land this change, you'll need to sign the Google CLA as outlined by the earlier bot comment.

If you have any issues doing so, please let us know. Thanks again!