Skip to content

feat: Remove Google App Engine standard support#4152

Open
stevehipwell wants to merge 2 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
stevehipwell:remove-app-engine
Open

feat: Remove Google App Engine standard support#4152
stevehipwell wants to merge 2 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
stevehipwell:remove-app-engine

Conversation

@stevehipwell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stevehipwell stevehipwell commented Apr 14, 2026

This PR removes support for Google App Engine Classic (Go < 1.12) including removing the appengine build tag.

This change is required for #4151.

Signed-off-by: Steve Hipwell <steve.hipwell@gmail.com>
@gmlewis gmlewis changed the title feat: Remove app engine classic support feat!: Remove Google App Engine Classic support Apr 14, 2026
@gmlewis gmlewis added NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging. Breaking API Change PR will require a bump to the major version num in next release. Look here to see the change(s). labels Apr 14, 2026
@gmlewis gmlewis changed the title feat!: Remove Google App Engine Classic support feat: Remove Google App Engine Classic support Apr 14, 2026
@gmlewis gmlewis removed the Breaking API Change PR will require a bump to the major version num in next release. Look here to see the change(s). label Apr 14, 2026
@gmlewis gmlewis changed the title feat: Remove Google App Engine Classic support feat: Remove Google App Engine standard support Apr 14, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.83%. Comparing base (44908ea) to head (231607a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4152      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.76%   93.83%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         211      209       -2     
  Lines       19701    19685      -16     
==========================================
  Hits        18472    18472              
+ Misses       1031     1015      -16     
  Partials      198      198              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @stevehipwell.
LGTM.
Awaiting second LGTM+Approval from any other contributor to this repo before merging.

cc: @alexandear - @zyfy29 - @Not-Dhananjay-Mishra - @munlicode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Not-Dhananjay-Mishra Not-Dhananjay-Mishra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just one small question

Comment on lines +1876 to +1880

// withContext returns a shallow copy of req with its context changed to ctx.
func withContext(ctx context.Context, req *http.Request) *http.Request {
return req.WithContext(ctx)
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this helper function? Why can’t we directly use req.WithContext(ctx) where needed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants