Skip to content

feat(deps): upgrade upstream dependencies#842

Closed
Brooooooklyn wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/upstream-update
Closed

feat(deps): upgrade upstream dependencies#842
Brooooooklyn wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/upstream-update

Conversation

@Brooooooklyn
Copy link
Member

@Brooooooklyn Brooooooklyn commented Mar 14, 2026

Automated daily upgrade of upstream dependencies:

  • rolldown (latest tag)
  • rolldown-vite (latest tag)
  • vitest (latest npm version)
  • tsdown (latest npm version)

Build status: success


Note

Low Risk
Low risk dependency-only update; main impact is potential dev/build tooling behavior changes from the @vitejs/devtools upgrade and its updated transitive packages.

Overview
Upgrades @vitejs/devtools in packages/core from an alpha release to ^0.1.0.

Updates pnpm-lock.yaml accordingly, pulling in the 0.1.0 versions of @vitejs/devtools-* packages and bumping @rolldown/debug to 1.0.0-rc.9 via the new dependency graph.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit edd85d3. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for viteplus-preview canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit edd85d3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/viteplus-preview/deploys/69b4b8dfa39d9800084e64db

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: edd85d3ad5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

"@oxc-node/cli": "catalog:",
"@oxc-node/core": "catalog:",
"@vitejs/devtools": "^0.0.0-alpha.34",
"@vitejs/devtools": "^0.1.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Update devtools peer range after version bump

Bumping @vitejs/devtools to ^0.1.0 here leaves packages/core/package.json’s peerDependencies entry pinned to ^0.0.0-alpha.31, which does not include 0.1.x; consumers that install this package alongside @vitejs/devtools@0.1.x will see an unsatisfied peer (and installs can fail under strict peer-dependency settings). The peer range should be widened to include the newly adopted major/minor line.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

"@oxc-node/cli": "catalog:",
"@oxc-node/core": "catalog:",
"@vitejs/devtools": "^0.0.0-alpha.34",
"@vitejs/devtools": "^0.1.0",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Peer dependency range not updated with devDependency upgrade

Medium Severity

The devDependencies entry for @vitejs/devtools was upgraded to ^0.1.0, but the peerDependencies entry on line 131 still declares ^0.0.0-alpha.31. In semver, ^0.0.0-alpha.31 resolves to >=0.0.0-alpha.31 <0.0.1, so 0.1.0 falls outside this range. This means the installed dev version doesn't satisfy the package's own peer dependency contract, and downstream consumers installing @vitejs/devtools@0.1.0 will receive peer dependency warnings or errors.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

@Brooooooklyn Brooooooklyn deleted the deps/upstream-update branch March 15, 2026 01:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant